Of course I work for Geico. And Bank of America, Ashley Furniture, Burger King, Walmart, and every other damn company I have ever posted a response to a complaint on. I love how the moment you dispute or show common knowledge on any topic I immediately become an employee of said company.

Only idiots use that accusation son. IDIOTS. For your information, I work in a pharmacy. Jackass.

And you still continue to show how stupid you are by continuing to not understand why Geico did not pay you. As for the complaints online being over a million, ...every flucking business in the world has complaints.

"If I had done what these other people have done and hit other peoples automobiles, and then my insurance company had acted as geico has in these two cases; I would fire them because they are not doing what they are supposed to"


Bullshit. If you were at fault and your insurance company just paid and did not FIGHT for YOU as YOUR insurer, YOU would fire them because YOU would have to pay MORE money for YOUR carelessness. Insurers do exactly what Geico did, they fight for THEIR customers. YOU are NOT Geico's customer. Do you get it yet? YOU are NOT Geico's customer. YOUR insurance company should have done for you what you are bitching at Geico for not doing. YOU do NOT pay Geico so they are NOT obligated to YOU. YOUR insurer is.

I hate stupidity and you just reek of it.

How did I fail to report this? Hmm... I think that you too either didn't read what I wrote above or can't understand it. Actually you probably just work for geico and feel bad that you employer is getting bad press (Not undeserved press but public statements that while are true; are also very negative!) I guess you could just sum it up as geico sucks!! (Note pics above!)
I still think this is the right way to handle a bad insurance company. Even though they will get away with not paying for this for a while, in the end they will pay!! In fact, the way this will work out is that the trial will wind up costing geico multiple times more than it would if they had just stepped up and paid in the first place like they are supposed to. Why wouldn't you just pay automatically without having to be sued? If I had done what these other people have done and hit other peoples automobiles, and then my insurance company had acted as geico has in these two cases; I would fire them because they are not doing what they are supposed to!! See, these are documented wrecks! There are police reports and statements as to what happened and infractions issued for breaking traffic laws. All the facts agree and support each other as to what happened. There are no 'grey' areas at all in either of these cases. In fact, even the driver's own statements entered in the police reports, state exactly what happened. For geico to ignore this and to try and not just pay what is fair and reasonable for each of these wrecks is simply wrong. What I don't understand is that these are such 'small' cases that it makes no sense to me that they would try to get out of simply paying for damages. It is not like there were any deaths here or any capitol property damaged where we would be talking about multiple millions of dollars involved. In a case involving many millions of dollars it would be reasonable to get more experts involved and to even take it all to the courts. These cases are not that!! The property damage in each of these is under $5, 000. So explain to me how geico is doing the right thing here in refusing to pay!!
My insurance didn't drop anything! They called me more than geico did!! They kept calling to see if geico was handling everything correctly and on time. I had to tell them to not get involved. They wanted to expend their resources on this and I told them that I didn't want them to. I see it as a matter of principle. geico is responsible and my own insurance is not responsible or liable at all in any way. That is why I told them to not get involved. You see, when the courts hear these cases and find that it is geico's responsiblity they will wind up paying what is fair and resonable. The courts don't fool around either and in truth it will work out to be more than if I had just settled for some lowball amount from geico to begin with!! (Here, the looser gets to pay the lawyer fees for the winner as well so that will be another good thing for me!)
Since you didn't read above: My son wound up hitting someone once. My insurance was so fast to pay for the whole thing and not try to low ball the people he hit; those people told me how well they liked dealing with my company. My insurance let them go where they wanted for repairs and did all the leg work for everything so they wound up doing almost nothing! So I am really happy with the service I get from my company!! Up until then we didn't know if they took care of claims very well or not. I am very happy with my company and how they take care of me!! I am also very happy that I'm the one saving a lot of money over what I would have to pay if I had geico as an insurer!! (We quoted most of the insurance companies back when we switched to Liberty Mutual and I know how many thousands less than geico that we pay!!!) The icing on the 'cake' here is that not only do I pay a lot less for insurance I also actually have coverage without having to take them to court if I do have a claim!! The standard procedure for geico is to refuse to pay or low ball and then just see if they can get away with that. I couldn't remember this web site so I 'googled' what I could remember. One search string I used was 'geico sucks' and I only got over a half million web sites of 'satisfied' geico customers... Wow! Way to go geico. Seems you are doing very good at doing so poorly!!